Antiseizure Medications that Did Not Reach the Epilepsy Market: An Assessment of...

연구 요약

Antiseizure Medications that Did Not Reach the Epilepsy Market: An Assessment of Factors Contributing to Their Failed Clinical Development Over the Last Three Decades.

Drugs 학술지에 발표된 이 연구는 Bialer M, Perucca E 외 연구팀이 수행하였습니다.

이 연구는 'Antiseizure Medications that Did Not Reach the Epilepsy Market: An Assessment of Factors Contributing to Their Failed Clinical Development Over the Last Three Decades.'에 대한 과학적 분석을 제공합니다.

핵심 내용

The EILAT Conferences on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs), which have taken place biennially since 1992, have traditionally offered a forum for stakeholders from industry and academia to present updates on potential antiseizure medications (ASMs) in development. We reviewed publicly accessible data on compounds that were presented at EILAT conferences over this period but failed to reach the ASM market. The overarching aim was to determine the most likely reason(s) for terminating development and to provide potentially useful clues to improve the efficiency of ASM development in the future. We restricted our analysis to investigational compounds in clinical development that targeted common epilepsies. Of 56 such compounds, 15 reached the ASM market, 11 are still in development, and 30 had their development for epilepsy indications terminated. Compounds whose development was terminated include atimepazole, beprodone, cannabidivarin, carabersat, conantokin-G, dezinamide, elpetrigine, flunarizine, fluorofelbamate, ICA-105665, isovaleramide, JNJ-40411813, losigamone, naluzotan, padsevonil, pitolisant, ralitoline, remacemide, safinamide, soretolide, talampanel, tonabersat, T2000, T2007, valnoctamide, valrocemide, VX-765, zandatrigine, zuranolone, and 534U87. For most of these compounds, termination of development occurred during phase 1 or phase 2. Unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties, such as short half-life or high drug-drug interaction potential, were a common likely cause of early termination. Overall, the most common reason for terminating clinical development was lack of efficacy, possibly related, at least in some cases, to use of suboptimal trial designs. Review of preclinical data suggested that, for many compounds, suboptimal clinical efficacy was unlikely to be primarily explained by their mechanism of action. In some instances, failure to pursue an epilepsy indication could be explained by prioritization of development for other neurological or psychiatric conditions. This may reflect the perception of the drug market for common epilepsies being relatively crowded, and only attractive for compounds with outstanding safety or efficacy advantages over existing medications.

일반인을 위한 해석

구체적인 실천 사항은 담당 의사 또는 약사와 상담하시기 바랍니다.

실천 사항

• 현재 복용 중인 약물이나 영양제에 대해 궁금한 점이 있다면 담당 의사 또는 약사와 상담하시기 바랍니다
• 약물이나 영양제의 용법·용량을 임의로 변경하지 마세요
• 이상 반응이 나타나면 즉시 전문가에게 문의하세요

의사/약사의 전문적 판단을 대체하지 않습니다 (PMID: 41764707)